Agriculture, Andrew Lang, asylum seekers, Australia, Australian Government, Austria, barista, Beetroot Relish, Beetroot Relish Recipe, beetroots, bioenergy, Bob Dylan, Borgen, Brazil, Burnley Tunnel, Canada, carbon, carbon emissions, carbon tax, Cathy Wilcox, Christine Milne, climate, climate change, Coal, Coal mining, Community Garden, Community gardening, democracy, Denmark, education, energy, environment, EU, European Union, farm forestry, Finland, forestry, Germany, GHG, global warming, Green Renters, greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas emissions, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Hazelwood Power Station, health, heatwave, hospitality, infrastructure, Israel, Japanese, Kazuki Yamamoto, Latrobe Valley, Light The Dark, manufacturers, manufacturing, manufacturing sector, Manus Island, Melbourne, Mick, Mildura, Morwell, New Zealand, Norway, OECD, Paul Keating, Peter Reith, public transport, railway, renewable energy, Reza Barati, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, The Telegraph UK, The Times They Are a-Changin', thrip, Tony Abbott, UK, urban, urban garden guerilla, urban planning, urban sustainability, USA, Victoria, Westminster system
Never let it be said that those behind The Buzz can’t take constructive criticism. Yes, it’s true, posts of late have largely focused on the bounty from the backyard. But hey, it’s summer here, and there’s lots to be done – stuff to pick, eat or preserve. And sometimes, making a batch of beetroot relish provides a pleasant distraction from a world that appears to be on a path to imminent disaster. Still, this blog aims to maintain a healthy balance between the concerns of the backyard and those of the wider community. Thankfully Andrew Lang is around to call it how he sees it …
“Knowing Sophie’s predilection for topics that can be summarised by song titles from past eras I’ve come up with ‘The Times They Are a-Changin’‘. As a result, this piece might just get into print, or binary code, or whatever it is. My feeling is that we need a break from beetroot recipes, community gardens and the life cycle of the thrip, and that it’s time for a good rant. So here I go …
Things in Australia are really feeling like they are about to be turned upside down – a new mob is in power and they want to fix up all the stuff that they think needs fixing. Think Peter Reith on the waterfront. Think Paul Keating on the floating dollar. Think Christine Milne on … well, everything. Now it’s Abbott’s turn. But can we trust that Joe, Tony, Barnaby, Greg and Co. have the right basic thinking to work from? (Because if they don’t, we are only further up the creek.) Australia is already well behind other OECD countries in many respects; in manufacturing, education, R&D expenditure, value-adding of primary products, exports, provision of health care, welfare, long-term policies for infrastructure development, energy, energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, to name just a few.
I’d argue that, on a national scale, we lack a coherent longer-term perspective. I’m not sure if this is because of the quality [Ed.’s note: ???] of our politicians, or that the weather is generally warm, or that we can just get along by digging stuff up out of the ground. Maybe it is partly due to the influx of whingeing 10 Pound Poms. Maybe it’s the ‘she’ll be right’ attitude, intellectual laziness or political apathy. Whatever it is, we accept that the Westminster system of democracy (aka adversarial politics) is the best there is, and we don’t look for other more effective systems. Similarly, we more or less accept it when political or economic commentators say manufacturing in Australia is doomed, and we all need to take up training as Baristas and work in tourism or the hospitality industry.
It appears to be a foregone conclusion that global warming is inevitable and, as a result, by 2050 Melbourne will have the climate of Mildura and the issues that will come along with this – cane toads, dog heartworm, mosquito-born diseases, constantly-working desalination plants. And many (not you, of course) truly believe that Australia is responsible for no more than 1% of global GHG emissions, and that the carbon tax is an unfair impost on the working family, and global warming is best dealt with by the installation of more air-conditioners. When the train rails buckle in 45+ degree days, we assume this is normal.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. There are clearly other, better models for infrastructure investment, directing the bureaucracy, and reducing racism; or the host of other things, large and small, that we assume are normal. For instance, the issue of rails buckling due to major temperature change puzzles me. We don’t hear of this happening in other countries – Canada or Finland or Russia, for instance – where temperatures range from minus 30 Celsius to 35+. In these regions, the ground that carries the rails can go from frozen solid to swamp without any apparent problem.
I talked recently to a tunneling guy from Norway who was here for something to do with the Burnley Tunnel, and he was commenting about all the leaks there that were such a problem. ‘We don’t have this problem in Norway,’ he said. And then I was in Finland during the last election and mentioned to someone how big a problem it was that we had this hung parliament at federal (not to mention at state) level. ‘This is normal for us,’ she said. ‘Almost always the government here is a group of parties.’ I hear that in Denmark it is maybe 100 years since a single party had a majority. The Danish TV series Borgen is all about this.
It is lamentable that Australia has a policy vacuum in relation to forestry and farm forestry and there is no apparent concern from politicians. A lack of coherent intelligent long-term planning is also obvious in the areas of public transport, agriculture, urban planning, energy efficiency, energy from waste, passive solar building design, recycling. In some of these we are told we are doing well, but in comparison with OECD or EU standards, we simply aren’t.
Similarly, in Australia we are getting nowhere with this whole thing of the carbon tax and reducing national greenhouse gas emissions. Somehow the dialogue on these issues never includes the better models in place in Israel, Switzerland, Brazil, or the EU-15 countries. We never actually hear in detail about what China is doing in this respect, or New Zealand, or how the UK has made a recent turnaround, or how various states of the USA and provinces in Canada are working productively on all this. The ‘quality’ newspapers are failing to inform us and the specialist media is not much better. The ABC, with its mission to ‘Educate, Inform and Entertain’, is full of people (ex-lawyers, retired comedians, people with Arts degrees) who believe the same flawed information as do the public and politicians.
This brings us back to the talk about the decline of manufacturing and the solution in a development of the ‘service’ industries. In reality, when we compare ourselves to how things are elsewhere, many countries that have similar or higher wage rates and costs are manufacturing and exporting powers. It is clear from looking at some of these that the manufacturing sector here is limited by things that are not impossible to change. These include education and training, corporate taxation rates, wages/conditions/social security, investment certainty (i.e. smart long-term policy written into legislation, and sensible bi-partisan agreements), export support, and a focus on design and innovation. The Israelis, having worked on all these, are doing well, as are the Finns, Swedes, Austrians, Danes, Germans, Brazilians, and many others.
Once, when we had less than half the current population, Australia had an extensive rail network, a world-leading electricity grid, a major steel industry, and we processed much of our own wool to final product. We produced our own agricultural machinery, locomotives, ships and electrical goods. We led in many areas of scientific research, including plant and animal breeding and in medicine. We were aware of what was going on elsewhere, and we were up with the international leaders in many areas. But at some stage in the late 1960s or 1970s we really slackened off (perhaps this was coincidental with the formation of the EU and/or the removal of tariff barriers here). The countries named above continued investing in infrastructure and education, and focused on developing in areas where they had some advantage.
So the question is not whether we need some deep changes, but whether this mob is smart enough to do it and do it via a bipartisan process [Ed.’s note: that’s a rhetorical question, right?]. I feel that we are in for a period of pain and some social upset. So, perhaps it is a good time to double the size of the vegetable garden and invest in a milking goat. And maybe you should do that Barista training.”
Editor’s postscript: As I’ve plundered the web for images to run alongside Andrew’s rant I want to acknowledge my sources. The first (brilliant) cartoon is by Cathy Wilcox. The next photo is of the fire in an open-cut coal mine at the Hazelwood Power Station in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, which has been burning since February 8th 2014, pumping masses of carbon and other damaging toxins into the air, impacting on the health and safety of those living in the region. The picture of buckled railway tracks is from The Telegraph UK and is a now all too common experience in Melbourne during heatwaves. The graphic of projected carbon emissions by 2020 is from Greenpeace Australia Pacific; the great cartoon about the disappearance of the Australian manufacturing sector is by Mick. Finally, if you decide to change careers, this Japanese Barista, Kazuki Yamamoto, has elevated the skill of coffee decoration to a fine art. The feature image is from the ‘Light The Dark’ vigil held in Melbourne last Sunday night, protesting the death of asylum seeker Reza Barati at the Manus Island Detention Centre and the Australian Government’s inhumane treatment of asylum seekers in general.